Posts
Doing my research on our "up and to the moment" media, I have come across more articles that are slanderous and speculative, AT MOST.
I will try to summate without boring you too badly. The first article is apparent. It addresses Katherine Jackson and how she PLEADED with Lionel Richie to have Michael Jackson included in the new recording of "We are the World." I don't know about you, but if any celebrity would go as far as to make the King of Pop's mother publicly beg to have her son included in the new song recording would be pretty much the biggest BIGOT on the face of the planet. In retrospect, the BIGOT here is the media.
How dare they make Katherine Jackson come across desperate and Lionel Richie snobby!!!
HOW DARE THEY!
Hmm, umm, well...WASN'T MICHAEL JUST MINDLESSLY MURDERED????
Just you watch. Things are going to change.
I promise you.
Below are the following articles stated prior in my blog:
Lionel Richie, Quincy Jones honor Michael Jackson In The New Version Of "We Are the World"- CANADIAN PRESS
Judge Delays Access To Michael Jackson's Records - CHICAGO TRIBUNE
Jackson's Fame A Challenge For Defense - WASHINGTON TIMES (shouldn't they be focusing on the National deficit?????????)
RE: Michael Jackson in new version of "We Are The World."
ReplyDeleteHello again Ginger,
I hope all is well with you today. Sounds like Friday is a very busy day for you.
I didn't get the feeling Mrs. Jackson begged for Michael to be included in the new version. How I read it was he was going to be included before Mrs. Jackson asked. Her additional request was that Janet be included. I'm sorry, where's the harm? From the moment I heard they were re-working the song for Haiti, I assumed Michael's vocals would be worked into the new track. As we all know, he co-wrote the song.
I think that's a really nice touch having Janet participate. It warmed my heart. Interesting...no LaToya? Hmm, I guess we will just have to wait and see.
Peace
RE: Judge Delays Access To Michael Jackson's Medical Records
ReplyDeleteThe judge delayed on his ruling to Joe Jackson's request to Michael's medical records in his bid to sue for wrongful death to pursue a monthly allowance from his deceased son's estate.
I'm going to attempt to tread carefully here because one, there is so much we don't know and two, Michael's children. Two of them acknowledged their grandfather and said they love him on The Grammys last month. May God bless and protect them throughout their lives. They are children and as such, they are innocent and their father has properly raised them with an abundance of love.
There are so many questions here that this story raises for me and I'm not completely convinced this is the fault of the media. Joe Jackson going to court to obtain an allowance is odd to me. I know, that's an understatement big time. Brian Oxman as the attorney is odd to me. Is he a family friend? Family attorney? Family spokesperson? Which family member or members? Wasn't he fired by Michael in the early stages of the last child molestation charges that were acquitted? Didn't he fall asleep in court? Does he strike you as an individual who likes to bask in the light of the media? Wouldn't Mr. Oxamn profit by way of getting a piece of Michael's estate? Is it just me or is it not unsettling to profit in such a way as a friend?
Mr. Joe Jackson seeking an allowance from the estate is truly a sad state of affairs. Can't or don't other family members financially help out? Not one? Is he really asking for money from his son's estate to take care of his own children at age 80? Really?
I wish the family could find a way to heal the longstanding pain and avoid the airing of issues that should be private.
RE: Michael Jackson's Fame a Challenge for the Defense
ReplyDeleteThis piece is nonsensical to me. Coulda, shoulda, woulda. I am in complete agreement with you on this one Ginger. What's the point? "Expert" opinions from people not privy to the case details. Where's the enlightenment? The jury is supposed to be impartial and just look at the facts. Finding jurors willing to make the commitment of time in these challenging economic times might take awhile for such a high profile case. It will be done though.
I agree with you here Ginger, it was a waste of time reading this article. Like yourself, I didn't learn anything of substance.
Peace.
Well hello emmdeep,
ReplyDeleteAll is well. A very long and exhausting week but I believe we are fighting the fight of making life happen for ourselves, right?
Okay:
#1. I was just expanding on how the media made Katherine and Lionel Richie sound. There is no harm in her concern over making sure Michael and Janet are involved in the new project. I just didn't care for the way it was worded in the media. They could have taken a more respectful, gentle approach.
#2. Yes, Yes, Yes. I AGREE!! Excellently put.
#3. Thank you for your support. It is a non-sensical excuse to avoid the un-avoidable. The Judge is going to HAVE to delegate some authority and go forward with this hearing. It has the possibility of making him the most hated man alive, so we will see what happens.
Hi Ginger,
ReplyDeleteI thought this might be of interest.
Judge allows Joe Jackson some of Michael Jackson's hospital medical files: http:/c.news.yahoo.com/s/capress/100219/entertainment/us_michael_jackson.estate
Yes, thank you emmdeep. I'm on it. I will be posting something on that later today.
ReplyDelete