BARBARA WALTERS IS GUILTY!!

Barbara Walters prides herself on being an accurate and fair journalist, then why does she condescendingly question Michael what the "fine line" should be for the freedom of the press, ie. the paparazzi?

I think any person with a shred of integrity and dignity would be able to identify a quality journalist from the paparazzi. I believe her question is quite redundant and designed for a sensationalist purpose. 

Barbara idiotically goes forward in asking Michael what he believes the press should be able to report when certain publicity is being designed for an album release or tour. What is extremely tacky about this whole interview, provided to you on the link below, is that Barbara is rationalizing the acts of the press in the wake of Princess Diana's death. She died not more than 2 days before this interview.

Like I have said before, when is enough going to be enough?? 

The media won't accept the responsibiltiy of their irresponsiblities that continually cause the death of one beloved celebrity after the other.

Before I leave, I have one more question to make you think: 

Did Barbara ask Michael about how he felt about his "Wacko-Jacko" title becasue she really cared or because she was seeking a reaction that she knew would generate more viewers??

Just a thought.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CRV_zpRiyqc

Go ahead Barbara. Jump in with the rest of them. All you are is a glorified paparazzi with an oversized paycheck.